In late January, California tribal leaders gathered and told ICE participants that they will not put legal sports betting on the 2026 ballot. Per a recent report covering state gaming updates, Indian Country has reached some consensus, but polling indicates voters are not interested. Specifically, California Nations Indian Gaming Association (CNIGA) chairman James Siva said tribes have “come too far and have too far to go to rush into this complex sports betting (issue) which is tied to igaming.” His remarks at the event led a chorus during the “State of Gambling in California: Current Trends and Future Prospects” discussion at the ICE convention in Barcelona.
For this report, SBS will be going over the latest gaming news coming from the Golden State along with some additional thoughts and information regarding California wagering.
Noted in the same report, Siva was joined by Pechanga Band of Mission Indians councilmember Catalina Chacon and San Manuel Band of Mission Indians vice chairman Johnny Hernandez. The panel was the last of four put on by the Indian Gaming Association (IGA). Additionally, a how-to guide for working with Indian Country, a history of how San Manuel grew gaming, and a discussion about remaining growth opportunities for tribal sports betting rounded out the conversation. However, the news was the tribes’ announcement that despite feeling pressure from the rise of sweepstakes, they would not pursue another ballot initiative so soon after spending nearly hundreds of millions to defeat a commercial proposal in 2022.
“It’s not going to happen in 2026,” Chacon said. “The data is telling us that the time is not right. Definitely not 2026, we’re looking more like 2028, but it has to include all tribal communities in California.” Hernandez would go on to add. “It has to include all tribes, including non-gaming tribes. I agree with Catalina that all tribes have to be in agreement. Gaming must go through the tribes.”
Noted in the same report, getting all of California Indian Country on the same page is no simple task. There are more than 100 tribes in the state. They range from the wealthy and well-known to rural tribes that struggle to get the most basic services. Pechanga and San Manuel were among the most major contributors in the campaign to defeat Proposition 27 in 2022. Financed by seven commercial sports betting operators, Prop 27 would have legalized digital sports betting across California, but the tribes opposed it.
The tribal mantra, the report points out, continues to be that any gaming expansion must originate in Indian Country. Tribes have exclusivity for Class III gaming and they will not be rushed. “We have come too far to rush into this, potentially damaging the foundation that we have built,” Siva said. “For 2026 we are being very patient. The outlook is looking toward the future.”
The somewhat hidden news from the session is that tribes appear to have reached at least a top-line consensus. Chacon repeatedly used the word “ownership” when talking about legislation. She indicated that this means all tribes must buy into a plan. The discourse is slightly different than it had been previously, when the word was “consensus.”
Also covered in the article, California tribes have what’s called a Revenue Sharing Trust Fund (RSTF) from which gaming tribes currently funnel $1.1 million per year to non-gaming tribes. The RSTF will surely be up for discussion among tribes as they sort out how to share the wealth once sports betting – and eventually online casino games – are legalized. The $1.1 million figure dates back to 1999 and, given inflation and the changing economy, raising it seems to make sense. The idea behind the RSTF is that tribes that are not geographically positioned to have land-based casinos can still get some benefit from legal gambling. An online component could change that.
In 2022, the article goes on to note, the tribes were aiming to legalize in-person wagering only while commercial operators were looking at digital betting. None of the tribal leaders made clear during the conference whether the next initiative would be in-person only or have a digital component. In other California gaming news, IGA conference chairman Victor Rocha has been stunned by the rise of sweepstakes and last fall ran a series of webinars about them. The unregulated operators have served to galvanize the legal industry and even give tribes and commercial operators – often at odds – a common enemy.
After you are all up to speed in relation to the latest gaming updates and notes coming from the Golden State, make sure to check out the excellent array of info for you at SBS. For even more info on the topic covered here, the California sports betting guide has your back with an excellent assortment of California gaming notes. On a separate note, for those interested in diversifying their payment options, look no further than the payment methods rundown, which goes over a variety of options for deposits and withdrawals. Here, qualified customers can learn more about these options by using crypto or more traditional banking routes. Finally, for those who are eligible and looking for some higher-stakes wagering, look no further than the VIP sports betting sites breakdown which covers a variety of excellent information.